Your review should have two goals: Your introduction should include an overview of the book that both incorporates an encapsulated summary and a sense of your general judgment.
This is the equivalent to a thesis statement. Do NOT spend more than one-third or so of the paper summarizing the book. The summary should consist of a discussion and highlights of the major arguments, features, trends, concepts, themes, ideas, and characteristics of the book. While you may use direct quotes from the book make sure you always give the page numbersuch quotes should never be the bulk of the summary. You might want to take the major organizing themes of the book and use them to organize your own discussion.
This does NOT mean, however, that I want a chapter-by-chapter summary. Your goal is a unified essay. So what do I want, if not just a summary?
Throughout your summary, I want you to provide a critique of the book. It is not necessarily negative. Nor do you need to know as much about the subject as the author because you hardly ever will. The skills you need are an ability to follow an argument and Write Philosophy Book Review a hypothesis. Regardless of how negative link positive your critique is, you need to be able to justify and support your position.
Here are a number of questions that you can address as part of your critique. You need not answer them all, but questions one and two are essential to any book review, so those must be included. The answers should be part of a carefully constructed essay, complete with topic sentences and transitions.
What is your overall opinion of the book? On what basis has this opinion been formulated? That is, tell the reader what you think and how you arrived at this judgment. What did you expect to learn when you picked up the book? To what extent — and how effectively — were your expectations met?
May 30, · How to Write a Book Review. Writing a book review is not just about summarizing; it's also an opportunity for you to present a critical discussion of the book. How to Write Philosophy. Most are well acquainted with the essay and the long winded book, but for those who just can't write an essay, then this is for you. Jan 19, · Even novelists trained in philosophy have sometimes insisted no. Can a novelist write philosophically? Also in the Book Review. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews is an electronic, peer-reviewed journal that publishes timely reviews of scholarly philosophy books.
Write Philosophy Book Review Did you nod in agreement or off to sleep? Did you wish you could talk back to the author? Amplify upon and explain your reactions. How clearly and in what context is it stated and, subsequently, developed? To what extent and how effectively i. Use examples to amplify your responses. If arguments or perspectives were missing, why do you think this might be? How well have they been achieved, especially with regard to the way the book is organized?
Are these aims supported or justified? You might look back at the introduction to the book for help. What assumptions lie behind these points? How effectively does the author draw claims from the material being presented? Are connections between the claims and evidence made clearly and logically?
Here you should definitely use examples to support your evaluation.
PNTV: On Writing by Stephen King
What conclusions does the author reach and how clearly are they stated? Do these conclusions follow from the thesis and aims and from the ways in which they were developed?
In other words, how effectively does the book come together? Identify the assumptions made by the author in both the approach to and the writing of the book.
For example, what prior knowledge does the author expect readers to possess? How effectively are those assumptions worked into the overall presentation? What assumptions do you think should not have been made? Are you able to detect any underlying philosophy of history held by the author e. If so, how does this philosophy affect the presentation of the argument? click
How to Write A Book Review Hans Pols Unit for History and Philosophy of Science University of Sydney Philosophy of the Book Review A book fills a gap. Philosophy + Reviews. Book of the day Humankind by Timothy Morton review Knowing the Score by David Papineau review – sport meets philosophy. Listed in order of importance, which of these you include will depend on the context of the review: 1. Summarize, in your own words, what you believe are the main ideas. I’ve lately been contemplating the question of what makes a popular philosophy book a needed to be able to write a book on review of The World. Summer is a time when many of us have a little extra time for reading. For me, that means Go Set a Watchman, some Haruki Murukami and James Lee Burke, plus summer.
source How does the author see history as being motivated: What kind of impact does this view of historical motivation have upon the way in which the author develops the book?
Is the interpretation biased? Can you detect any distortion, exaggeration, or diminishing of material? If so, for what purpose might this have been done, and what effect does hit have on the overall presentation? These questions are derived from Robert Blackey, "Words to the Whys: What Should Be Searched? Search all of Carleton. Campus Directory A-Z Guide. How to Write a Critical Book Review.