New York Times copy editors facing staff cuts or new jobs in a re-imagined editing system sent a letter to the newspaper's two top editors Wednesday protesting the oncoming changes.
We take some solace in the fact that we have been assured repeatedly that copy editors are highly respected click. Cutting us down to 50 to 55 editors from more thanand expecting the same level of quality in the report, is dumbfoundingly unrealistic.
Work with Top Letter Editing Site Us on a new number. About two dozen editors reviewed the letter at a guild meeting Tuesday, according to a source at The New York Times. The New York Times is in the process of reorganizing the paper's copy desk to shift the balance of the newsroom toward reporting and away from editing. That reorganization includes a buyout program aimed at reducing headcount at The Times. If The Times can't draw down enough employees through buyouts, layoffs could ensue.
But as we continue this difficult transition, we ask that you sharply increase the available positions for the copy editors, as well as an unknown number of other staff members, who have effectively lost their jobs as a result of your actions. We have begun the humiliating process of justifying our continued presence at The New York Times.
If that is true, we have a simple request.
But after living more than a year and a half under a cloud of uncertainty about our jobs, a cruelly drawn-out period in which Top Letter Editing Site Us suspended major financial arrangements and life decisions, and carried an ever-growing kernel of fear. After we were compared to dogs urinating on fire hydrants when we edited stories, in an internal report that called for the elimination of "low-value editing" and made it Top Letter Editing Site Us but clear which stages of editing this referred continue reading — so much so that it became a running joke among the copy desks for months "How's the low-value editing going in your section today?
After some of us were recruited for "editing tests" to streamline the process, or, as it turned out, figure out how to make our own jobs obsolete. After enduring a newsroom-wide copy-editing overhaul last year that consolidated the desks, transformed the scope of our duties and confused a whole lot of reporters and section editors but ultimately made us think we would at least keep our jobs.
After learning that this new setup would be undone just months after it was put in place, with the whiplash announcement that our jobs would simply be eliminated. After we were told that to remain employed, we would have to apply for new "strong editor" positions meant to be a hybrid of the two types of editors at The Times, backfielders and copy editors, and realized only copy editors had to be reevaluated categorically.
After we heard that The Times would soon go on a hiring spree, just as it gets ready to shed jobs, and thought to ourselves that it is particularly ruthless to talk about all the others you intend to court as you break up with someone.
In fact, we feel more respected by our readers than we do by you. We are living in a strange time when routine copy-editing duties such as fact checking, reviewing sources, correcting misleading or inaccurate information, clarifying language and, yes, fixing spelling and grammar mistakes Top Letter Editing Site Us news covfefe are suddenly matters of public discourse. As those in power declare war against the news media, as deliberately false or lackadaisical reportage finds its way into social media feeds, readers are flocking to our defense.
They are sending us pizza. And they are signing up for Times subscriptions in record numbers because they understand that we go to great lengths to ensure quality and, most important, truth. This should be a triumphant moment for all Times employees.
Everyone from the ground floor up should be thrilled and proud to come to work, and walk into the building feeling valuable and needed. And that is why it feels like such a profound waste that morale is low throughout the newsroom, and that many of us, from editors to reporters read more photo editors to support staff, are angry, embittered and scared of losing our jobs.
You may have heard that the elimination of the copy desk is widely seen as a disaster in the making including by many managers directly involved in the processthat the editing experiments were an open failure, and that there is dissension even in the Top Letter Editing Site Us ranks and across job titles regarding the new editing structure.
But you have decided to press forward anyway, and this decision betrays a stunning lack of knowledge of what we do at The Times. Come see what we do. See the process, what comes in and what actually goes online or to print. See what we do before you decide you can live without it. We copy editors understand that our roles will have article source change, that we must find ways to edit more efficiently, and that The Times must evolve into a nimbler, more visual, more digitally focused news outlet.
Source will learn and we will adapt.
Tagged: top application letter editing websites us This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by GalenMetQC 6 days, 15 hours ago. Author Posts. Tagged: top letter editing websites ca This topic contains 0 replies, has 1 voice, and was last updated by BrantorMF 1 day, 6 hours ago. Author Posts January 8, Essay contests. top cover letter editing website us entry-level. 0. Pretraga. Pretraga: Artikli. Top cover letter editing website us. Contact Us; Top cover letter said that he was purposely hindering the boards search top cover letter editing site for university Get a free email top cover letter. Clinton Lucas from Richmond was looking for top cover letter editing sites us Rohan Berry found the answer to a search query top cover letter editing sites us.
In fact, through many workflow changes, through the adoption of new technologies and platforms, we have already proved we can.
We only ask that you not treat us like a diseased population that must be rounded up en masse, inspected and expelled.
Top 5 fonts for editing !!
After all, we are, as one senior reporter put it, the immune system of this newspaper, the group that protects the institution from profoundly embarrassing errors, not to mention potentially actionable ones. We are one of the crucial layers of review that you seem so determined to erase, as the sudden removal of the public editor role shows. We are stewards of The Times, committed to preserving its voice and authority.
You often speak about the importance of engaging readers, of valuing, investing in and giving a voice to readers. We abhor your decision to wipe out the http://cocktail24.info/blog/resume-symbol-on-the-e.php desk.
We worry that if we do not speak out, you will feel emboldened to make similarly sweeping staff reductions elsewhere in the company without debate.
Robechon or Guy Savoy that are supposed to be outstanding. These also are either variable or fixed. He felt that the two giants are not earning too much.
Goodchild's two children and her partner had to be consoled by emergency workers after the accident. But there's a clear dividing line between the two.
22, 1997 - 11-year-old girl dies and two boys injured when a carriage on the Octopus ride breaks free and falls to the ground at the Rylstone Show near Mudgee, NSW. On Wednesday, the Gold Coast park said the gates would open up to the public at 11am on Friday, with entry proceeds going to Australian Red Cross charity. A source told ESPN that footage from Fox showed Ortega going into the locker room, allegedly reaching into Brady's bag and taking the jersey. The NFL, which did not name the suspect, said the jersey was part of a larger haul that was in the possession of a credentialed member of the press.
We worry that the errors and serious breaches of Times standards that copy editors catch each day will go unnoticed — until Top Letter Editing Site Us are embarrassed into making corrections. We worry, in short, that the newsroom has forgotten why these layers of editing were created in the first place.
But we still believe in The Times. A previous version of this story made reference to "layoffs" in the first sentence. In fact, employees are currently facing buyouts. Benjamin Mullin is the managing editor of Top Letter Editing Site Us.
He previously reported for Poynter as a staff writer, Google Journalism Fellow and Naughton Fellow, click the following article journalism innovation, business practices and ethics.
New York Times copy desk to top editors: The letter concludes by admonishing editors for turning "your backs on us. But after living more than a year and a half under a cloud of uncertainty about our jobs, a cruelly drawn-out period in which we suspended major financial arrangements and life decisions, and carried an ever-growing kernel of fear; After we were compared to dogs urinating on fire hydrants when we edited stories, in an internal report that called for the elimination of "low-value editing" and made it all but clear which stages of editing this referred to — so much so that it became a running joke among the copy desks for months "How's the low-value editing going in your section today?
We are your readers, and you have turned your backs on us. We ask that you believe in us. Respectfully, The Copy Desk Correction: Comments View the discussion thread.
User account menu Register Log in Search.