Whilst answering the question it is important to have a clear definition as to what a monster is, in order to make it apparent as to what each side is arguing for and against.
Stalin: man or monster - Stalin Essay Example. Throughout Stalin’s reign, he had his supporters; however, he had far more. 1) The three sources all show Stalin. ‘A’ is very different to ‘B’ and ‘C’ in many aspects, but there are also some similarities. Source ‘A’ is a. Stalin was a man with too much power and a man who didn't realise the consequences of his power and policies, he was not a monster. Joseph Stalin - WikipediaJoseph Stalin; Иосиф Сталин იოსებ სტალინი General Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist.
My personal definition of a monster is an inhumanly cruel or wicked person. So the essay http://cocktail24.info/blog/essay-on-why-we-need-religion.php discuss whether or not Stalin was a monster under my personal definition. I am going to discuss both sides of the argument and then draw a conclusion. When deciding whether or not Stalin was a monster, it is easy to get carried away with minor details.
Stalin: man or monster? Source A is very different to sources B and C. Stalin is shown standing by pyramids ‘visit Russia’s pyramids’. A Custom Essay Sample On. Stalin, was he a man or a man or monster? The answer to this question depends entirely on how you look at it. On one hand, Stalin did an amazing job of bringing. Need essay sample on Stalin: Man or Monster? We will write a custom essay sample For Only $/page. order now. When deciding whether or not Stalin was a monster. Essay Writing Guide. Stalin: Man or Monster? Joseph Stalin was a Soviet dictator who in some people's eyes was a magnificent leader who saved the Russian economy. Stalin man or monster. After discussing the various views of whether Stalin was a man or monster I Concluding this essay I believe that Stalin was neither a.
After all Stalin united a continent stretching from the Baltic to the Bearing Straits. One could argue that the situation In Russia was so desperate that only the pressures of brute force could have produced such a rapid industrialization, together with the necessary food.
All his aims had a purpose and indeed lives were lost, that is not debatable, but it was necessary it order to achieve his aims. Most of his polices were successful. Stalin, enforcing the Collectivisation Policy, solved the food shortage.
More food was grown, modern agricultural methods were put into place ending the famine. Also the new methods of farming being taught by agricultural experts brought backward farmers up to date and the exports raised money for industrialisation. Source B shows Stalin to be great man who made Russian industry prosper.
It shows Stalin mixing with the workers who seem to be very honoured indeed to be meeting Stalin. There was an almost non-existent unemployment rate.
Stalin also encouraged woman to work by setting up childcare services; four out of five new workers recruited between and were women.
Stalin also made education compulsory and free for all. Industrialisation created a huge increase in population of raw click here such as oil, coal and steel. Also the modernisation was vital in order to survive World War II. Source C shows how Stalin was idolized by the Russian people. Also his style of government, i.
Surely, this could not be a monster just a very hard man with clear aims that would do anything to achieve them, in order to help his people. Any action taken by Stalin were sincere and honourable. One could argue the supreme justification for the defeat was thanks to Stalin, not forgetting that it was only Germany that attempted to invade Russia. Stalin obvious appeared strong to opposition because no attempts to invade were made during his time in power, apart from Germany.
Source G also backs up the idea that Stalin felt that brute force was needed in order to achieve his Stalin Man Or Monster Essay. Source G basically says that Stalin intentions were honourable.
He is saying that he did what he did for the Soviet people. All these sources urge one to please click for source that Stalin was not a monster but just a hard man with a strong desire to achieve his aims and no amount of human cost was going to stand in his way that was consequence.
After all his aims were in order to create a greater Russia. After all, any actions taken by Stalin would have of seemed successful due to the desperate Stalin Man Or Monster Essay Russia was in.
One of the many monstrous actions taken by Russia was the Purges. These murders Stalin Man Or Monster Essay economic progress by removing many read article the most experienced men, and almost caused military defeat during the first few months of war by depriving the army of all its experienced generals.
As the purges were extended university lecturers and teachers, miners and engineers, factory managers and ordinary workers all disappeared. About 18 million people had been transported to labour camps, 10 million died. The long-term impact of living with terror and distrust haunted the USSR for a generation. AroundParty members were arrested on charges of anti-soviet activities and either executed or sent to labour camps.
Collectivisation bought yet more deaths, 5 million starved to death during the Famine in and after the war source the Kulaks, millions died.
Also food production fell which led to economic problems due to the millions of deaths. Industrialisation led to enormous human cost. The conditions were appalling and there were many deaths and accidents. There was a great deal of inefficiency and duplication of effort and waste. Stalin was quite prepared to destroy the way of life of the Soviet people to help industrialisation.
Sources A, B and C also reinforce the idea that Stalin was a monster. They all show how Stalin used propaganda to paint a false picture of him self.
Stalin: Inside the Terror
All these sources give a different impression of Continue reading, however there are some similarities. It shows Stalin and the results of his policies according to the artist.
The cartoon features Stalin showing three pyramids of skulls as if he was a tour guide. This source is very famous and was drawn by an exiled Russian, therefore the artist could be bitter and biased against Stalin and his policies. It is trying to show the Stalin Man Or Monster Essay of industrialisation. It shows Stalin talking to the workers, they seem very proud to be meeting Stalin.
Because it is an official Soviet painting it is very likely to be biased and a source of propaganda as it would be Stalin or the government who commissioned it. Source C is a photograph of Stalin congratulating wives of army officers. The women are reaching for Stalin in a fanatical manner; they seem desperate to touch him. The source is a photograph, which gives the impression that it is a reliable source. However this is not the case, Stalin could have had the photograph doctored or had people pose and claimed it was showing something it was not, therefore disassociating himself from the Purges.
All the sources give very different impressions of Stalin. Source A shows Stalin to be a monster responsible for the death of millions of people. Collectivisation caused the death of thousands of Kulaks and left many homeless and starving. Stalin Man Or Monster Essay million people were executed during the purges, two million people died in camps, one million people died in prison and eight million people died as read article result of the work ethic Stalin began.
Source B shows Stalin to be a great man who made Russian industry prosper. Life was very hard and factory conditions were very dangerous. Any kind of discipline problems such as lateness or absence would be punished with sacking, which could also mean the loss of homes. Source C shows Stalin to be a caring man who was congratulating the wives of his army officers.
It shows him to be admired, even idolized by his people and put in a hero like position. Many people saw him as the hero of Russia and a very great man. However many opposed Stalin and his policies, but in voicing their view they could be punished with death. Stalin had one million people executed during the purges.
Many of the people executed had opposed Stalin but were accused of crimes such as spying and plotting to murder. Many others were sent to labour camps.
However, sources B and C are similar in some ways. They both show Stalin to be a great man. Soviet people were deluged with portraits, photographs and statues of Stalin. Therefore executing them to stop them from ever over ruling him was a true case of paranoia, which was going to work against him in the long term.
In order to achieve his aims, he did not need to kill so many people. The enormous human cost Stalin Man Or Monster Essay purely down to his monstrous personality. Inthe USSR was a modern state and it was Stalin Man Or Monster Essay that saved it from defeat when Hitler invaded in Russia won the war in spite of Stalin not because of him.
The situation was so desperate that any government could improve the current situation. Ridiculously high targets for industrial production placed unnecessary pressure on the workers leading to slipshod work and poor quality products.
All the sources mentioned reinforce this argument that Stalin was a monster. In conclusion, I feel that Stalin was a great leader however I do believe that he did incorporate into go here personality some read more qualities. By this I mean that I do not truly believe that any normal human being could kill millions and millions of innocent people, and argue that what he did was not the action of a wicked or inhuman person.
One must not forget that Stalin Man Or Monster Essay was voted into power under the ideal that he would follow the idealism of Marx and Lenin. However, instead of creating a new classless society in which everybody was free and equal, ordinary workers and peasants were just as exploited as they were under the Tsars.
I would personally follow the view, that Stalin was a talented politician with great drive and ambition. However, he was taken over by power, which turned him into a monstrous oppressor. I feel that had Stalin not been so monstrous his rule would have gone by without acknowledgement. Finally, I feel that Stalin was character with a very evil monstrous nature which was brought to light through the power that he gained.
The Economic Consequences of the Peace. Hi there, would you like to get such a paper?
How about receiving a customized one?