Molly Ivins wrote an essay about gun control a number of years ago, in I believe.
In order to persuade her audience, she uses a number of techniques such as sarcastic humor and general and political examples to prove that guns are lethal and must be controlled or, more preferably, banned. This is a good remark to open with, as this shows she is not some radical pacifist looking to prevent the use of guns anywhere.
She then urges her readers to consider the pros of using knives; Ivins includes some sarcastic humor by pointing out that knives promote physical activity, leading to a healthier nation, whereas guns require no activity whatsoever.
Angela White English 10/18/ Synopsis Get a Knife; Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns Molly Ivin’s view is she is not. Jan 18, · Molly Ivins wrote an essay about gun control a number of years ago, in I believe. Her essay, "Get a Knife, Get a Dog, But Get Rid of Guns" explains. Molly Ivins, a liberal columnist who was made famous by picking fun at her home state of Texas and mocking politicians, battled breast cancer before she died in Read this essay on Get a Knife, Get a Dog, but Get Rid of Guns. Come browse our large digital warehouse of free sample essays. Get the knowledge you need in order to. Summary: Molly Ivins writes an argumentative essay upon the controversial topic of guns. She begins her argument that she is in fact not antigun, but believes other.
This sarcastic but truthful point warms up her audience, and shows her readers where she stands on this issue. She gently coerces her opinions through some humor and levity as opposed to going right in with heavy artillery. One downside to this humor may be the potential decrease in gravity of the point she is trying to make. In doing this, Ivins comes away from the humor and becomes serious about the topic, and also points out that she knows her facts, laws, and politics.
Her explanation of fourteen year old boys, crazy religious cults, and other unregulated citizens not being well-regulated militia strongly shows that many have taken the amendment out of context. She then proceeds to remind people that nobody alive now knows exactly what Thomas Jefferson was thinking when he wrote this amendment, so many interpretations and extrapolations of the text are inaccurate and bias.
This is a great technique for trying to convince people that the amendment should be taken literally.
Her use of the automobile example is very clever, unique, and powerful. This, I feel, is something that can definitely sway her audience. Ivins points out that times have here, and that the U. Lastly, her examples stressing the importance of power without discipline are very powerful, as they clearly show why gun-control laws may in fact be necessary.
Ivins does a good job addressing her opinion and explaining her side on the issue. Starting with some sarcasm read article humor that faded into seriousness was a good technique to engage her audience and get them thinking. Her examples are powerful, but some may backfire, for there are many counter-examples or counter-clauses that gun activists use daily.
Her essay certainly seems timely, although it was written a number of years ago. The issue is sensitive, and I hope that, whatever happens, some solution is reached. Good analysis overall, Zack. Ivins is certainly taking some chances with her rhetoric and the way she treats her audience may alienate some readers.
When we got to class, I did notice that she actually showed ain that by the end, she certainly did come off as completely anti-gun.
You are commenting using your WordPress.
You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Letter from Birmingham Jail: February 3, at Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Email required Address never made public.
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.